Meristem Land & Science
Beef Science

 Home
Beef Science Beef Science: Top Stories

 Food safety helps drive consumer confidence, says branded beef producers group more
 Project success a sign of growing producer support for wildlife habitat more

Archives To full index

 

Research finds feedlot air quality within standard limit for livestock facilities

Date posted: November 1, 2004

New research shows that microbial population levels in feedlot air, though higher than air upwind of the site, are generally within the standard threshold limit value set for livestock facilities. The research has also provided a better understanding of the movement of feedlot air.

Understanding the distribution of air from feedlots - which could contain biological entities, such as bacteria and dust - is important in reducing liabilities and encouraging acceptability of feedlots and current manure management strategies, says Dr. Abimbola Abiola, the Olds College researcher who led the study. "Greater acceptance of feedlot facilities and beef production in general in Alberta will help the industry reach its full potential with fewer environmental concerns from the general public."

Abiola led an extensive research project, funded in part by the Canada Alberta Beef Industry Development Fund (CABIDF), to determine whether feedlots are contributing to microbiological contamination of surrounding air. A total of 5,400 air samples were taken from two feedlots in the windy Chinook region of Alberta during the spring and fall of 1999 and 2000.

Using the two feedlots, researchers examined the population distributions of total bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, fecal coliforms, fungi and thermoactinomycetes spores. Gram-negative bacteria can cause human respiratory problems and discomfort; fecal coliforms, which indicate manure contamination, can cause gastro-intestinal disorders in humans and cattle; and, fungi and thermoactinomycetes spores can both cause respiratory infections, especially in asthmatics and those with impaired immune systems.

Air samples were collected in and around both feedlots at nine locations per feedlot. Distances were calculated using the centre of the feedlot as a benchmark. Locations were 1 and 0.5 km upwind, three locations within the feedlot (0.5 km upwind of the centre, the centre and 0.5 km downwind of the centre), and 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 km downwind of the feedlot. Both facilities were about 1 km in diameter and were surrounded by croplands and pasture lands.

In addition to microbiological sampling of the air, samples were also sent to Alberta Research Council for olfactometer (odour) analysis - partly because of public perception that once odour from a feedlot is detectable, there is automatic exposure to disease-causing organisms.

Results confirmed that total bacteria levels were highest in air samples taken from the centre of the feedlot. However, there was new information gathered about the movement of air in and around feedlots, as well as the microbial contents of the air itself.

"In all situations, total bacterial populations were elevated within the feedlots during all sampling events, but they returned to upwind levels - which are much lower - between 0.5 km and 1 km downwind," says Abiola.

The recommended limit for total bacteria in the air is 10,000 cfu/m3 according to the American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists. This limit was exceeded only at two locations - the centre of the feedlot and just downwind of the centre - during only one of the sampling events.

In terms of overall feedlot air quality, the bottom line is that while microbial populations in the feedlot were generally at an elevated level when compared to upwind air quality, the levels were generally within the standard threshold limit value set for livestock facilities.

With respect to odour, there was a poor correlation between onsite perceived odour and olfactometric odour analysis. While there was a strong correlation between total bacteria and onsite odour intensity measurements, there were site-to-site differences in odour and microbial air quality."

CABIDF is a joint $16.4 million fund of Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. The Fund is administered by Alberta Beef Producers and has supported more than 50 projects in six major categories identified to benefit the Alberta beef industry.

Reprintable with credit. This article is available for reprint, with acknowledgement of the source: Canada Alberta Beef Industry Development Fund (CABIDF). CABIDF research reports

Page Top

© 2004 Meristem Information Resources Ltd.
Meristem® is a registered trademark of Meristem Information Resources Ltd. All rights reserved.
Legal Disclaimer